December 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Sponsors

« OQO Pocket PC | Main | MySQL Workbench Beta »

March 16, 2006

Comments

So, what does it proof: that you should be happy with second best if you don't have money? Remember, beggars can't be choosers.

Think of it this way, you might get away running a low-budget website on MySQL, but will you use it to store your financial data? I think not...

If you want a balanced opinion, why don't you ask the guys at OraFAQ.com? They obviously know both databases fairly well. And I bet that if they had a choice, they would prefer running on Oracle.

Frank, thanks for your comments. I just think it's ironic. It's like Microsoft's Hotmail running on Linux.

--Zack

Ironic indeed. The only difference is that the Oracle FAQ is not an Oracle owned site, but is independently operated by the user community.

My quoted post contained database error messages. A minor failure on a free web site is acceptable. It is not acceptable for a production system supporting 3,000 plus users.

"Horses for courses." Please.

Remember, Oracle owns both InnoDB and Berkeley DB - and is a strong player in the MySQL space.

More info at (you guess where): http://www.orafaq.com/wiki/MySQL

The comments to this entry are closed.

Copyright

  • Copyright (c) 2005-2010 M. Zack Urlocker

Google


Guitarcenter